Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. Request PDF on ResearchGate | On Jan 1, , M. Behlau and others published Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). The Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) was developed to provide a protocol and form for clinicians to use when assessing the voice.
|Published (Last):||1 February 2015|
|PDF File Size:||7.21 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.9 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. A total of 20 subjects: Validity of rating scale measures of voice quality.
Jody KreimanBruce R. This abstract may be abridged.
Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Rating action. References Publications referenced by this paper. Am J Speech Lang Pathol.
For reliability purposes, the voice samples of 40 dysphonic neurogenic, functional with and without laryngeal lesions adults years of age and 10 normal healthy speakers were recorded.
Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol
Copyright consensud American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the property of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission.
Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Showing of 33 references. Marc S de BodtFloris L. This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and disordered voices.
Voice Disorders Search for additional papers on this topic. Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. Psycho-acoustic evaluation of voice.
Development of a standardized clinical protocol. The CAPE-V protocol and recording form were designed to promote a standardized approach to evaluating and documenting auditory-perceptual judgments of vocal quality.
Development of a standardized clinical protocol Gail B. Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. Auditory-perceptual assessment of voice a main approach in the diagnosis and therapy improvement of voice disorders. Peter MartinChristpher Evalyation Journal of speech, language, and hearing research…. Development of a standardized clinical protocol”.
Establishing Validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
Access to Document The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality. Remote access to EBSCO’s databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations for personal, non-commercial use. Link to publication in Scopus. The Americleft Speech Project: Skip to search form Skip to main content.
Recommended articles Citing articles 0. Second, we compared our raters’ judgments of overall severity to a priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices. A summary of the consensus conference proceedings and the factors considered by the authors in developing this instrument are included. Copyright and Conflict of Interest All submitted manuscripts should be accompanied with a statement from the author, showing there ot no conflict of interest regarding that article. Perceptual and acoustic analysis of voice in individuals with total thyroidectomy: AU – Gerratt, Bruce R.
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology18 2 The act of submitting a manuscript to the journal carries with it the right to publish that paper and implies the transfer of the copyright from the author to the Publisher. StefanovEileen M Marrinan Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery: